SenatorWatch

Welcome To SenatorWatch.This is a place where we will watch Connecticut Senators and other in the U.S. Senate on how they vote on key issues affecting the American people and the folks right here in Connnecticut. SenatorWatch will also be a place where our views on the issues the Senators take will be shared with all of you in a progressive fashion.Please join us for lively discussions and comments as we watch if Senators are voting and representing us here in Connecticut and the Nation.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Ned Lamont For President 08

Well everyone is writing something about what happened on Election day.The truth is that Lieberman only won because Connecticut Republican Party and the national Republican Party flipped and supported Lieberman .Joe only got about 25 % of the Democratic Vote in Connecticut which says alot.
Ned Lamont won in more ways then Lieberman knows Ned sparked a movement a Vote For Change in Connecticut and the rest of our nation.
The fact that all the attacks on Ned and newspapers that endorsed Lieberman saying Ned did not have Liebermans experience .Its that experience Joe has that was and will be the problem in Washington Politics as usual.
If Ned reads this or his staff I think Ned should run for President of the United States .He has great ability to lead,speak and give our Nation the direction we need on Alternative Energy ,Educational Reform, Campaign Reform,the Environment,War and Peace issues ,World Political issues,and above all can work with other countries to solve problems not start them.
The Democrats that might run for office many of them voted for the Iraq War Ned Lamont was always opposed to going to War with Iraq .
Ned Lamont should be drafted by the Democratic Party to run as there Candidate for President.
Ned would have been a great Senator but he will also make a great President .So let it be said here lets start a National Campaign to daft Ned for U.S. President in 2008. Its Neds lack of Pac money from lobbyists that make him the right choice in 2008.The people will decide show Ned you support him for President in 2008.Ned thankyou for starting this spark and this is only the beginning.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Ned's Closing Speech

Ned will be back and when he is we will all be there.What a great speech to end this part of the Vote for Change.

Tom Swan

Listen to Tom Swan final speech before Ned comes on to do is consession speech.Wy to go Tom .

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

FOX NEWS Channel and Lieberman Pull Dirty Tricks at Milford Polling Area This Morning

Breaking news credit DailyKos Story posted by couple polling for Ned Lamont This morning.
Hope the Major News networks pick this story up early before the polls close.


Ct-Sen Let the Shenanigans Begin!!
by theark
Tue Nov 07, 2006 at 07:32:19 AM PST
This is my first diary and I don't know what I'm doing, but I feel like I have to put this somewhere.
My husband was out poll-standing morning for Ned Lamont at an elementary school in Milford, Connecticut. He showed up at 6:10 with his signs and little pass-out cards ready for a day of enthusiastic Nedrenaline. I'm really excited about his enthusiasm, because before the first debate, he was on the fence, but after seeing both Ned and Joe in action, he has been 100% behind Ned.
More...
theark's diary :: ::
So my husband is the first one there, in the dark, in his little Ned Lamont watch cap and his "Stand Up For Change" t-shirt. Right off the bat an old guy shows up and my husband said, "Hey! I hope you'll consider voting for Ned Lamont today!" and the guy said, "I'm not voting for that guy!" My husband thought, Ah, yer gonna die soon anyway. It was pretty quiet after that. A volunteer for our State Senator, Gail Slossberg, was the only other one who showed up to stand there with him within the next hour.
Then the fun began. At around 7:00, a car pulled up and a woman wearing a suit got out. A Fox News truck had been there all morning, and the woman began asking the Fox News cameraman where to place the signs to keep them in the frame. They started putting out Joe signs right in front of the Lamont signs. Around 7:15 a car with Massachusetts plates and an "I'm with Joe" bumper sticker showed up and put up about 30 signs. Cars with New York plates and Joe bumper stickers were pulling up all over the place. My husband called stepped inside to get on his cell to call the Lamont people to tell them what was going on.
When he came back around 7:30 it was PANDEMONIUM! A black town car with Connecticut plates and the tag number 2 pulled up--you may know this one--pulled up and out stepped Joe, shaking hands with Jim Amann, a Connecticut resident, and, I'm so ashamed to say, Speaker of the House in Connecticut. What a douchebag. Other people had shown up seemingly from nowhere: two firemen from Stamford in yellow t-shirts, fawning Fans of Joe with hands for him to shake, including a typical Mom & Pop straight from Central Casting, and, oh, here he comes, the symbol of our inability to locate Joe for the last six years--the bloodhound!!! After they'd set up this typical Milford scene, they proceeded to interview Joe on Fox & Friends. At least he chose a hard-hitting venue to get his message out. After the taping was over, everyone dispersed, gotta go, and, my husband said, it was like one of those cartoons where the whirlwind leaves just a little piece of paper to flutter softly to the ground.
As an aside, my husband told me that not a few people said to him while this was going on that while it was fun to shake a Senator's hand, they were voting for Ned.
Aw what the heck, it's my first diary, let's do a poll:

Monday, November 06, 2006

Danbury Lamont Rally Today

Another great video of Neds last big rally before Tuesdays election.This is it.

Yale Daily News Endorses Ned Lamont Today

Published: Monday, November 06, 2006
Ned Lamont

As members of the generation that is fighting in Iraq, we find a lot to like about the Democratic nominee for Senate, Ned Lamont. We agree with Lamont's opposition to the dire prospects for the United States in Iraq and to the equally dire situation in Washington, D.C., that led us there. Insofar as a vote Tuesday is a vote for or against the status quo, we would vote against the status quo and for Lamont.
Incumbent Sen. Joseph Lieberman, in his 18 years in the Senate, has had many successes. He supports environmental reform and a woman's right to choose, and he is well-respected as a statesman. His emphasis on bipartisanship is, moreover, not something we take lightly in this era of truly insane partisanship.
With that said, the bipartisanship of Sen. Lieberman is not what America needs. Not when that bipartisanship means voting for intervention in the Terri Schiavo tragedy, as Lieberman did. Not when it means voting to allow "aggressive interrogation" of suspected enemy combatants, as Lieberman did. Not when it means accepting the endorsement of a group of local clergymen who oppose, on biblical grounds, rights for gay citizens, as Lieberman did just last Thursday. Not when it means supporting an energy bill granting substantial tax cuts to energy companies, as Lieberman did.
And not when it means supporting the failed invasion and occupation of Iraq, as Lieberman did when Bush first decided to invade, and as he continues to do by suggesting that Iraq could work out, if only we're a little more patient. We have seen no evidence that our continued presence in Iraq would improve the security situation there, particularly not under the leadership of President George W. Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Lieberman's bipartisanship is not that of a visionary willing to go all out for his ideals. It is a concessionary sort of bipartisanship from a politician who gives in to the agenda of the ruling party without questioning its leaders when they err.
On the contrary, Lamont has proven that he will be an outspoken voice in challenging the administration. He supports gay marriage, a woman's reproductive rights, and expanded health insurance for all Americans. Lamont would act as a check on the incompentant leadership of the Bush administration in a way that Lieberman has repeatedly - on Iraq, on faith-based initiatives, on civil liberties - demonstrated that he is unwilling or unable to do. Senators are powerful not just in casting their votes but in sparking discussion, and we believe Lamont would be more effective than Lieberman at pointing out ways our country can improve.
Legitimate arguments have been raised that the Democrats' future is in the middle ground - but we believe the Democrats will not succeed unless they are able to articulate a clear and consistent alternative platform of their own. Lamont has articulated that alternative. Certainly, Lieberman's moderate role enables him to build compromises that could benefit Democratic positions, but he has not done so, and the frequency with which he diverges from his party on core social and political issues leaves us wondering what exactly his version of the Democratic Party would stand behind. In the long run, the Democrats should not compromise their values in order to broaden their appeal; they need to articulate those values better in order to win over voters. Lamont, in his surprising campaign, showed he could do just that.
For these reasons, we support Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate.

Connecticut Senate Race Final Online Votes Being Taken

To all our readers around Connecticut at SenatorWatch we are conducting an online vote to see who you really support in this Mid-Term electionTuesday.The Polls have predicted that Lieberman will win .SenatorWatch feels they are all way off including the famous Q-Polling that some believe is God.What I am asking all of you in Connecticut to do is vote for the Candidate of your choice .It will be interesting to see if the online votes show different results verses the Q-Polling results which I don't buy as again the truth of how you will vote in the booth on November 7th.You will find the Senate poll I've created on this page.I would like to look at the results on Tuesday and see who you supported for U.S. Senator of Connecticut .My feeling is there is some push polling going on within some of these polls including the Q-poll big time.So let the votes begin.

SenatorWatch Predicts A Lamont Win On Tuesday

Enough of the polls from the Insiders that have been appearing everywhere these last few days.All I will say is this that the voter base in Connecticut and across the nation is angry and they want solutions to the problems that the Republicans and Bush with the help of a few former Democrats namely Joe Lieberman of the Connecticut For Joe Lieberman Party created.Blame is put where it is due.Today Joe Lieberman tried to keep Ned Lamont from marching with fellow Democrats in the Veterans parade in Hartford ,Connecticut but he still marched and greeted these Veterans who thanked him for having the courage to speak out on the War in Iraq and that we need to bring the Troops home. Whats happened to Joe Lieberman that he try's to exclude Ned Lamont from the Parade ?Then again this is the new Joe Lieberman walking with Nancy Johnson a Republican who is in the battle of her life.A picture says a thousand words.Joe is a Republican the only thing he needs to do is change his party when its over. The people are not smiling in Connecticut they want real change as a Blue State.Joe will have his problems after this election is over still with the $387 ,000 dollars in petty cash still no answer or books on that yet.My feeling is Ned Lamont will beat Joe Lieberman by a 52% for Lamont and 46% for Lieberman.Alan will do better then anyone expected between 15-20%.Well I could be off a few points here ot there .I am not a professional Poll taker, but this is what I see happening based on the anger on the ground level which these other polls in the Connecticut Senate race and out of state have really no clue of how people really feel.My feeling no matter what prediction is presented Ned Lamont will win because his message is clear and voters in Connecticut get it which is all that matters not what Poll takers think we will do on Tuesday November 7th. I have seen the grassroots people involved in Ned's Campaign they are a large dedicated group of Connecticut voters from all over the state.I do not think Lieberman even with the Bush Machine helping him has a chance over these folks.People are ready to vote for change and I can tell you they will.No matter how many vote for Joe signs are posted on telephone polls.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Danbury News Times Gives Ned Lamont A Big Endorsement For Change

For U.S. SenateElect Ned Lamont; it's time for change
Nov 05 2006
For months now, Joseph Lieberman has been running hard to keep his appointment with the voters on Tuesday.
He didn't expect it to be this way. The three-term senator, vice presidential and presidential candidate expected an easy re-election to a fourth term in the U.S. Senate.
But the war in Iraq and Ned Lamont, a Greenwich businessman, got in the way.
Lamont challenged Lieberman for the Democratic nomination and won the party primary in August.
Lieberman then decided to run a campaign as a petitioning candidate, gathering voters' signatures to obtain a place on the Nov. 7 ballot.
Lamont and Lieberman are joined on the ballot by Republican Alan Schlesinger. His party nominated him but has not supported him. Schlesinger has run an energetic campaign on a shoestring.
Public opinion polls show strong voter sentiment across the nation that Washington isn't working and change is needed. Concern about President Bush's conduct of the war in Iraq is a big part of that unrest.
Connecticut got a head start on that conversation this summer during the primary campaign for U.S. Senate. While Lieberman's struggles shocked the Washington establishment -- and Lieberman himself -- criticism at home had been building for years.
As he pursued his national political ambitions, Lieberman too often ignored Connecticut. He also pursued policies that left longtime supporters on the sidelines, wondering about his judgment.
His insistence, for example, that Congress should meddle in a family dispute involving Terri Schiavo, a woman who doctors said was in a vegetative state, was disappointing.
His unquestioning support of Bush administration policies on Iraq, even as American military casualties mounted and Iraq spiraled out of control toward civil war, was a failure of duty and he should be held accountable.
It took the Lamont challenge to get Lieberman back to Connecticut to explain some of the choices he has made in Washington.
During the primary, Lieberman sounded like a man who was ready to finally exercise his responsibilities of congressional oversight on Iraq.
But as a petitioning candidate this fall, he has returned to largely unquestioning support of the Bush war policies.
The News-Times Editorial Board has twice endorsed Lieberman for election to the Senate, citing his experience, intelligence and hard work. The Editorial Board also endorsed Lieberman in the August primary. After he lost, the Editorial Board suggested he withdraw from the campaign.
In Tuesday's election, the Editorial Board endorses Ned Lamont.
From the start of his campaign, Lamont has been a confident candidate, sure of his message as an outsider, not intimidated by Lieberman's long experience in government.
Lieberman dismisses Lamont as someone who wouldn't be able to match his presence in the Senate. Lieberman summons the same attitude toward voters who disagree with him on the war.
The problem for Lieberman is that all of his experience, all of his knowledge, didn't help him recognize what the Bush war policies were doing and now American military personnel are in the middle of a civil war in Iraq.
If the most experienced members of Congress didn't exercise oversight responsibilities on Iraq, have they really earned re-election?
If elected, Lamont will have to learn the ways of Washington. But Washington would benefit from having new people who ask questions, who wonder why "business as usual" can't be challenged and changed.
Lamont served in town office in Greenwich and is a successful businessman. He has a social conscience that motivated him to do more than just make a donation to help poor students; he volunteered to teach a class of Bridgeport teenagers about business.
In a year when the voters must impose change on Washington, Ned Lamont is the better choice.

Saturday, November 04, 2006

The Final Countdown To The Senate Race

Well its the final days before you get out and vote for the best person to represent Connecticut voters.With all the tricks the Lieberman campaign has pulled in the last few days and before Ned Lamont won the Demcratic Primary.Just on there actions alone should be enough to make up your mind up.Yes the Iraq War,Education,Universal Healthcare,saving Social Security, Renewable Energy Wind Solar,Water,and other forms of clean energy are what the issues are in this election with the War draining our Domestic Economy with no end in sight. If you truly are against the Bush/Cheney/Rumfeld Policies of this Republican administration and you are a Connecticut voter who plans on voting for Joe Lieberman think about what you are saying if you do this. When you have Senator Lieberman not willing to change and realize the wrongs he is supporting within the Bush administration.Also these newspapers that recently have endorsed Lieberman for varied reason all come in agreement on one point that he knows those in Washington and can get things done.That is the sole problem with Washington Politics is that the Editorial boards of some of the Connecticut papers that again have endorsed Senator Joe Lieberman do so without regard to the peoples choice in this election from the Democratic Primary of August 2006.Not only that these few papers that have endorsed Senator Joe Lieberman do so knowing that he supports the Bush War policies and also a voting record that in the last 6 years has been Republican Joe not Democratic Joe. He is nolonger a Progressive nor anylonger a Democrat.There are problems these papers decide to ignore the petty cash slush fund and other reported issues in the press.I have talked with one reporter at the Stamford Advocate who cannot understand the Editorial boards endorsement of Joe Lieberman .I think its time we investigate the owners of these papers and why they truly feel a need after the Democratic Primary to support Joe Lieberman none of it makes sense.On another note newspapers that have so far endorsed Ned Lamont did it for all the right reason The NYT's ,Westport News and related papers and the other day The Meriden Record Journal.These papers had the guts to say it like it is no flip flop just the facts of why Joe has to go and Lamont needs to get our vote on November 7th.If your having problems with Senator Lieberman on the War and still had planned on voting for him because you remember when he was a progressive reality check he nolonger represents those feelings and beliefs.Its time to vote for a change .You cannot be Anti-War and then say I support Lieberman then your just going to be a flip flop voter who will support a Senator who supports the Presidents regressive policies and Domestic and World problems.The War cannot be stopped by just one man but if you vote for someone who will set a deadline and be a voice in the Senate for change against the Bush policies then you will be voting for someone from your heart.On November 7th if you want to stop Bush/Cheney/Rumfeld then vote for something vote for a reason to vote .Don't buy the editorials that say experience is whats important .If we vote on Joes experience recently its one thats a bad dream come true.Ned Lamont does not need Pac money from special interests or the Republican Insiders that are backing Liebermans campaign even if Lieberman will not comeout publicly and say this .So you have the freedom to make the wrong choice or the right choice.I hope you will walk in that voting booth and vote for what you really want not in fear but for a real change for a new era of honesty,and Progressive Politics in Connecticut and Washington.Its time to kick the good old boys out and Lieberman is part of that school in Washington thats part of the problem.This is the real Club that needs to be exposed in Washington and those in it need to be throw out of office for not representing the concerns of the American People and Lieberman is one of those in that Club on November 7th from Connecticut to California vote for a change not stay the course we have tried that and it has failed.

Friday, November 03, 2006

The Westport News and Related Papers Endorse Ned Lamont For U.S. Senate

The Westport News (as well as related papers in Greenwich, Darien, Norwalk, Fairfield, and New Canaan endorsed earlier today Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate here in Connecticut.

Below is the endorsement statement .

U.S. Senator
Sen. Joseph Lieberman's staunch support of the increasingly unpopular War in Iraq and his growing reputation for hedging his bets has diminished his reputation. In addition, the negativity of the senatorial campaign, along with the Shays vs. Farrell brouhaha, has disturbed many voters and reinforced a general distaste for politics as usual.
Particularly telling is the TV footage from Lieberman's 1988 campaign against Lowell Weicker in which he calls for change, says he will not miss more than 300 votes and promises not to serve more than three terms. In a sense, he has become his own opponent.
The Republican Party candidate, Alan Schlesinger, although he did fairly well in the debates, has essentially been abandoned by his party. According to some polls, as many as 70 percent of Republicans are reportedly supporting Lieberman, who formed his own party after his stunning loss to Ned Lamont in the Democratic Primary.
For his part, Lamont is a quick study and is growing into the role fast. He has even started to show signs of brilliance. We endorse Lamont because he has become more than just a lightning rod for anti-war sentiment. He has become a fresh and intelligent voice for change, something we sorely need in Washington.
As a businessman and a political outsider, he has an independent streak and should be less susceptible to politics as usual, lobbying and large campaign donations. Lamont doesn't need the position or the money. He wants to serve.

Meriden Record Journal Endorses Ned Lamont For U.S. Senate

Another Great Endorsement for Ned
The Meriden Record-Journal (my hometown paper and the temporary hometown paper of Lamont HQ) endorsed Ned for Senate this AM in an editorial that nails Joe oh, so well.For U.S. Senator: Lamont’s the choice Editorials For U.S. Senator: Lamont’s the choice As the vice presidential candidate in 2000, Joseph I. Lieberman had a choice. He could either seek re-election to the Senate at the same time, or leave the field open to another Democratic candidate. He chose to run for both. Had he won the vice presidency, his Senate seat would have been vacated, and filled at the discretion of Connecticut’s Republican governor, John Rowland, who very likely would have inserted a Republican. By insisting on having it both ways, therefore, Lieberman cost Democrats an opportunity. He chose his own interests over those of the Democraticparty. Once again. .. This year, Lieberman has done it again. The senator who sought his party’s presidential nomination in 2004 made preparations to abandon his party even before the outcome of the August primary, by lining up enough signatures to run as an independent. In his strange concession speech on primary night, Lieberman compared the loss to a football game, saying he was only down after the first half. By refusing to cede his interests to the decision of Connecticut Democrats, Lieberman also prolonged a headline-grabbing race that continues to draw attention away from other Democratic efforts in this election. Once again, his self-interest has cost Democrats opportunities. The three-term incumbent has since campaigned on experience and on a message of bipartisanship, saying his focus is on representing the people of Connecticut. But his track record on the loyalty front makes such pronouncements suspect, at least. What changed? During his successful bid to unseat Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in 1988, Lieberman pledged to limit himself to three Senate terms. He was asked recently by the editorial board of this newspaper what had changed his mind. He said that when he’d made that pronouncement he wasn’t sure he would get to serve even six years. He also said he felt Weicker had stopped producing and didn’t feel that was true in his own case. In any event, it was another example of a senator willing to rewrite the rules, even his own, to suit himself. Dissatisfaction with Lieberman’s performance is precisely what led to Ned Lamont’s victory in the primary. Lieberman’s stubborn support for an increasingly unpopular war in Iraq and his perceived too-cozy relationship with the Bush administration was a vulnerability the senator either failed to recognize or refused to take seriously until it was too late. During the primary he appeared surprised, even miffed, that his re-election was not going unchallenged. Now the senator wants a do-over. Ned Lamont’s campaign has never had the seasoned slickness the senator’s has displayed since the primary. On occasion, he still comes off as a neophyte. But his earnestness and commitment have never been in doubt. Stared down Lamont may not have political experience, but he has successfully stared down a Juggernaut. Until his primary victory, there was little encouragement for his campaign outside the grass-roots convictions from which it was born. In fact, there was considerable pressure on him not to pursue his challenge to Lieberman. But during an otherwise slow summer, Lamont’s unlikely campaign drew the national spotlight and the newcomer performed admirably under the pressure. Lamont’s lack of political polish has also been a charm. His attack on insider Washington has never appeared to come from a less-than-genuine conviction and he has maintained his poise as he refined his message. The U.S. Congress is indeed in need of a change. For the past six years, bipartisanship notwithstanding, Lieberman has been part of the problem, not a sign of its solution. Lamont brings a fresh perspective, not the result of naivete, but a concern that the future and health of the nation requires a challenged status quo. Focal point Lamont wants to establish universal health care. He wants to use funds now being misspent in Iraq to bolster educational and employment opportunities at home. Experienced in running a business, he does not want to see children inherit the misfortunes of profligate and irresponsible budget practices. Significantly, the Democratic candidate sees Meriden as the focal point for manufacturing and distribution in the state, a perspective he’ll be urged to remember should he arrive in Washington. Lamont, whose only elected experience was as a Greenwich selectman, has a genuine claim to being a Washington outsider, a claim too many others try to make for political expediency. He can be counted on to help re-establish the checks and balances the country desperately needs right now. We endorse Ned Lamont for the U.S. Senate.

Lieberman Volunteers Attack Lamont Bus in Hartford

Below is a report from David Sirota who was at this event that was disrupted by Lieberman Campaign workers below is a first hand account of what happened .Word has it that there is video that was caught of the disruptive Lieberyouth thugs blocking the door read the report below.SenatorWatch will try to get video when its available .


Lieberthugs in Hartford
(A report from David Sirota from the tour… more later on this and the great event in Enfield that took place later this morning – Charles)
I must say, it is quite a sight to see young people voiciferously cheer on a broken-down career politician who has used his position to insist that other young people continue to be killed and maimed in a war based on lies. And though I had heard a lot about Joe Lieberman small band of paid thugs from the primary, seeing it up close today was, in a word, frightening.
The moment the bus door opened today at the Hartford senior center at this morning’s first bus tour event, the wild-eyed group of Lieberthugs surrounded and screamed at Ned as he met with seniors. The group was pathetically small, although admittedly loud. They didn’t scream anything other than the word “Joe” – they didn’t chant about the war or any other issue. Just “Joe.”
That was, in poker terms, the “tell.” The fact that they weren’t there to push any issue but instead there to scream the name of a tired career politician – that was the giveaway that these were not impassioned volunteers motivated by a cause – these were mercenaries who have sold their soul for a piece of street money.
When I realized this, I suddenly understood why they were so wild-eyed: because something has to have short circuited in your brain to be a young person willing to so viciously attack someone like Ned Lamont whose candidacy, at its root, is about trying to prevent more young people from being maimed and killed in the Iraq War. Sure, the street money probably helps make this short circuit happen. And as Dan ”$30,000 a Month” Gerstein shows, Lieberman is having to pay people a lot of money to get them to remove their souls.
But still – money only goes so far, and it begs some questions: would the Lieberthugs be willing to sell off their souls if, say, they were on deck to be drafted for combat in Iraq? Would they still be taking Joe’s dirty lobbyist money and screaming “Joe” in the face of an honest war critic if it was their arms and legs that were at risk of being blown off in deference to Lieberman’s “stay the course” policy?
I would like to hope not. I would like to hope that even someone like Dan Gerstein who has proudly auctioned off his humanity for $30,000 a month would behave differently if, for instance, he or his family members were at risk of coming home in a body bag from a war his boss still smiles at and boasts about…
...but something tells me things have gone so wildly off the tracks at the Lieberman campaign asylum that, in fact, they wouldn’t behave any differently. And that gets us back to exactly why the Lieberman campaign is, as I said at the beginning, so frightening: because these people are very openly trying to define American politics as a place that is only about their own power and self-preservation – no matter how many of our troops die because of it.
- David Sirotain Hartford
(A report from David Sirota from the tour… more later on this and the great event in Enfield that took place later this morning – Charles)
I must say, it is quite a sight to see young people voiciferously cheer on a broken-down career politician who has used his position to insist that other young people continue to be killed and maimed in a war based on lies. And though I had heard a lot about Joe Lieberman small band of paid thugs from the primary, seeing it up close today was, in a word, frightening.
The moment the bus door opened today at the Hartford senior center at this morning’s first bus tour event, the wild-eyed group of Lieberthugs surrounded and screamed at Ned as he met with seniors. The group was pathetically small, although admittedly loud. They didn’t scream anything other than the word “Joe” – they didn’t chant about the war or any other issue. Just “Joe.”
That was, in poker terms, the “tell.” The fact that they weren’t there to push any issue but instead there to scream the name of a tired career politician – that was the giveaway that these were not impassioned volunteers motivated by a cause – these were mercenaries who have sold their soul for a piece of street money.
When I realized this, I suddenly understood why they were so wild-eyed: because something has to have short circuited in your brain to be a young person willing to so viciously attack someone like Ned Lamont whose candidacy, at its root, is about trying to prevent more young people from being maimed and killed in the Iraq War. Sure, the street money probably helps make this short circuit happen. And as Dan ”$30,000 a Month” Gerstein shows, Lieberman is having to pay people a lot of money to get them to remove their souls.
But still – money only goes so far, and it begs some questions: would the Lieberthugs be willing to sell off their souls if, say, they were on deck to be drafted for combat in Iraq? Would they still be taking Joe’s dirty lobbyist money and screaming “Joe” in the face of an honest war critic if it was their arms and legs that were at risk of being blown off in deference to Lieberman’s “stay the course” policy?
I would like to hope not. I would like to hope that even someone like Dan Gerstein who has proudly auctioned off his humanity for $30,000 a month would behave differently if, for instance, he or his family members were at risk of coming home in a body bag from a war his boss still smiles at and boasts about…
...but something tells me things have gone so wildly off the tracks at the Lieberman campaign asylum that, in fact, they wouldn’t behave any differently. And that gets us back to exactly why the Lieberman campaign is, as I said at the beginning, so frightening: because these people are very openly trying to define American politics as a place that is only about their own power and self-preservation – no matter how many of our troops die because of it.
- David Sirota

Thursday, November 02, 2006

New Ad: Paul Newman

SenatorWatch Endorses Ned Lamont For U.S. Senate

Its an amazing election season first Joe Lieberman loses the Primary against Ned Lamont on the major issue of this nation and Connecticut the War in Iraq.

Senator Joe Lieberman seems now that the war is not getting any better will change his comments to the media on the War and try and make you think he wants to bring the troops home.

He wants you to think he was really against the war and yet when asked recently if he would vote to do it again his answer was yes.

Senator Joe Lieberman will not be in the 4th debate and there is good reason for him not to.

The polls are shifting and the gap and lead he had is closing.

I believe the same thing will happen as did the Primary that not only will this gap close before November 7th but Ned Lamont grassroots activists will put him over the top.

Senator Joe Lieberman only claim in his ads I helped save the Sub Base.

In the last 6 years Connecticut has seen nothing done on behalf of the citizens of Connecticut.

Senator Lieberman has supported alot of the Bush Republican proposals even through he will say some things against George Bush its all show no real substance at all.

From Educational issues ,Senior Citizens concerns,the Environment,Social Security,and War and Peace Senator Lieberman has sided to many times with George Bush and this is the Bi-Partisanship he wants you and me to buy.

Its time for a change and Ned Lamont will stand up for peoples concerns in Connecticut .

Ned will bring not only needed leadership as a new Senator in Washington but he will bring honesty and not be a yes man for the Washington Insiders Club , George Bush and The Republican Party.

Its time after all these years in office that someone is elected who will listen to the voters of Connecticut and bring there concerns and voices to Washington.

SenatorWatch feels that Joe needs to go and with that said Ned Lamont gets the SenatorWatch endorsement for the November 7th election .

New Ad: Mr. Lamont Goes to Washington

This new ad rocks the vote.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Bus Tour: Kerry Question

November 1st Bus Tour with News Media

SenatorWatch Election Poll Who Will You Vote For Vote Online

On November 7th Who will You cast Your Senate Vote?
Ned Lamont Democratic Party
Alan Slesinger Republican Party
Ralph A Ferrucci Green Party
John Mertens Independent Party Of CT
Joe Lieberman CT. For Lieberman Party
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Ned Lamont at Conn College Town Hall

Great meeting at Conn College with Students about the issues .Ned does a great job of presenting his solutions to our problems .Check this out.

Alan Schlesinger on Lieberman's $387K

CTBOB does it again with this interview with Alan on Liebermans slush fund of $387,000 dollar.Check this out.

Ned Lamont on Bush's Endorsement of Lieberman

“One man who’s stood by his decision is Joe Lieberman,” Bush said in an interview on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity and Colmes” show. “He understands the consequences.” Bush argued that the Democratic Party “ran him out of the party because he stood on principle.”


This confirms what Ned Lamont has been saying all along that Lieberman and George Bush are in the same political bed with each other on the issues.
Now the only thing Joe has to do is come out of the closet and say he is a Republican